Real long-tail keyword suggestions pulled from Google's own autocomplete, expanded across alphabet, question and commercial modifiers, then classified by search intent. No invented volume numbers.
Queries Google autocomplete across ~65 modifier patterns. Takes a few seconds. Nothing is stored.
Long-tail phrases are where a newer site can realistically compete. "SEO" is contested by agencies with a decade of authority behind them; "what is included in seo services" mostly isn't. The suggestions here are genuine queries — the same data Google shows in the search box as you type.
What this tool deliberately doesn't show is search volume or difficulty. Those numbers come from licensed clickstream data and enormous proprietary crawl infrastructure — the reason Ahrefs and Semrush cost what they do. Any free tool displaying volume figures is estimating loosely. Showing you a made-up number would be worse than showing none.
For actual volume on shortlisted terms, Google Keyword Planner is free with an Ads account and gives real ranges from Google itself. Use this tool to find candidates, then verify the few that matter.
By modifier pattern, which is fast and roughly 85% accurate rather than perfect:
Always confirm by searching the term and seeing what type of page actually ranks. That check takes ten seconds and beats any classifier. More on why in how to select keywords.
Related: on-page analyzer, SERP snippet preview, how to select keywords.
Three quick ratings on the site itself — not a testimonial, just honest feedback that helps me improve it.
Goes straight to me — no email required, nothing published without asking you first.
Feedback like this is how the site gets better.
Pre-written answers, not a live AI. For anything specific, email me.